Morris v. . House
Supreme Court of North Carolina
CONTROVERSY Without Action, under sec. 56Y, of Tbe Code, submitted to Btarbuck, J., at Spring Term, 1898,- of tbe Superior Court of McDoweiu. County. Upon tbe agreed statement of facts, bis Honor decided in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the agreed statement of facts, his Honor decided in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant appealed. This is a controversy without action, submitted under section 567 of The Code. The following is a statement of the facts agreed upon by the parties.
1. John Carson, Sr., was the owner of a large tract of land in McDowell County, and devised the same to his sons, J. Logan Carson and George M. Carson.
2. J. Logan Carson and George M. Carson conveyed to their brother, William M. Carson, a one-third undivided interest in said land, in trust for the benefit mentioned in said deed of trust. (551)
3.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- England v. . GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Hare v. . HollomonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Avery, Ex ParteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Adams v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Harris v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Card v. Finch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Rackley v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Cochran v. Linville Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Rackley v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Pinnel v. BurroughsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.