Legal Opinion

Rackley v. . Roberts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover a one-seventh interest in the land described in the complaint. The tract of land originally belonged to Daniel Glisson, who died in April, 1880, leaving a will, in which a (202) one-seventh interest in the said land was devised to the feme plaintiff. Mary Glisson, the widow of Daniel Glisson, qualified as his administratrix with the will annexed, and on 2 November, 1881, instituted proceedings against the heirs and devisees of the testator for the sale of his lands for assets. Some of the defendants were personally served with process. It does not appear, except…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. England v. . GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Sutton v. . SchonwaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Matthews v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Morris v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Downing v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Richmond Cedar Works v. StringfellowDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1916
  4. Gillikin Ex Rel. Gillikin v. GillikinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Alexander v. Iredell County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API