Legal Opinion

High & Workmen's Compensation Board v. Liberty Coal & Coke Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 16, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

Reversing.

The Liberty Coal & Coke Company and its employe, W. H. High, had each accepted the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. On May 3, 1921, High received an injury which produced a stiffness in the third joint of his index finger, and applied to the Workmen’s 'Compensation Board for compensation. On observation the board found that the stiffness was not total, but amounted to about 75%. Appellee testified that he was never laid off, or disabled, by the injury, but continued to work with a part of his hand, and his earnings thereafter were about…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Burbage v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Consolidation Coal Co. v. DittyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Black Mountain Corporation v. LetnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  4. Warner v. Lexington Roller Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  5. National Distillers Products Corp. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API