Legal Opinion
Chin v. CHRYSLER LLC
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 7, 2008No. 07-2760PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
Appellees are a putative class of owners of cars manufactured by appellant, Chrysler LLC (“Chrysler”). Almost thirteen years ago, they brought a products-liability action against Chrysler, claiming that certain braking systems in Chrysler’s cars were defective. More specifically, in a complaint that was later amended three times, appellees asserted a cause of action under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty- Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (the “Magnuson-Moss Act” or the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2301-12, and causes of action for common-law fraud and breach…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Landsman & Funk PC v. Skinder-Strauss AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Peter J. McNulty Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Ponzini v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Ecore Int'l, Inc. v. DowneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.