Ruina v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover on a policy of accident insurance, judgment, entered on .the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff beneficiary, affirmed, with costs. The burden was on the defendant to establish the lapse of the insured’s membership and in order to do so it was necessary for defendant to prove the mailing of the assessment notice of August 12, 1940. In our opinion the evidence adduced was insufficient to establish such mailing. (Gardam é Son v. Batterson, 198 N. Y. 175.) If, however, we assume that the evidence was sufficient to sustain an inference that the notice was mailed,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hastings v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- William Gardam & Son v. BattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Trusts & Guarantee Co. v. BarnhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Goeller v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Brown v. Provident Loan SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.