Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Furomori

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Exceptions prom Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY THE COURT BY

DE BOLT, J.

Tbe defendants Having been tried, convicted and sentenced on a charge that they did “assist in maintaining and conducting a certain lottery, to-wit: che fa,” bring the casa here on exceptions.

*345The record before us shows that at the time and place of the arrest of the defendants, the officers, without a search warrant, broke the door to the room in which the defendants were, entered, placed the defendants under arrest, seized and carried away a counting board, some che fa tickets, a tin box with a name in it and a book containing rules of the game of ehé fa,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. State v. TeahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ginoza Ex Rel. Ginoza v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kealoha v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. ShonHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Cozine v. Hawaiian Catamaran, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Nawelo v. Von Hamm-Young Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API