Legal Opinion
State v. Dickey
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 11, 2013No. A12-0516PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODENBERG, Judge.
Appellant appeals from her conviction of fifth-degree controlled substance crime following a trial on stipulated evidence conducted pursuant to Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 4. Appellant asserts that the district court erred in denying her motion to suppress the evidence that was discovered after a police officer stopped her vehicle, arguing that the police officer (1) did not have probable cause to arrest her and (2) may not stop a vehicle to effect a warrant-less felony arrest. We affirm.
*795FACTS
On June 28, 2011, police officers executed a search warrant on the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt HunterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In the Matter of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Special Permit No. 16868 (December 21, 2012) issued to Lynn RogersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Derrick Deshawn ShumpertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Kevin Lee AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.