Legal Opinion
Weide v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1895No. Nos. 9444-(222)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Egan, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
The city of St. Paul instituted condemnation proceedings for the purpose of taking the plaintiff’s land for a street, and on August 4, 1886, by the action of its board of public works, made an assessment of the costs, benefits, and damages from such taking, which assessment was duly confirmed September 13, 1886. The compensation allowed for such taking was the sum of $4,208, and the plaintiff, deeming herself aggrieved by the assessment, appealed therefrom to the district court of Ramsey county, where, upon trial duly had, the assessment was affirmed on or about the month of January, 1890.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Warren v. First Division of St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- City of Minneapolis v. WilkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Bacon v. CottrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Pettingill Theatre Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- County Board of Education v. FogartySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Watson v. Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- L. Realty Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931