Mothersill D.I.S.C. Corp. v. Petroleos Mexicanos, S.A.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Abe Ashcanase sought intervention in an admiralty action, arising from a series of contracts to construct a marine transportation system in Mexico, after the parties to the original action reached a settlement agreement. The district court allowed the intervention of right and subsequently entered judgment for the intervenor, awarding him payment due for services he performed concerning the Mexican project, 112 FRD 87 (E.D.Tex.1986). Because we conclude that the intervention was improper under the circumstances of this case, we reverse.
I
This case began as an admiralty action between parties…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Ceres Gulf and Esis/ina v. Cleaster Cooper, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (u.s. Department of Labor), Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Gould v. Alleco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- State of Texas v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Flying J, Inc. v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.