Legal Opinion

Kinkead v. Holmes & Bull Furniture Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1901No. 3498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thomas Carroll, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, J.

This is an action in damages brought by the appellant against the respondent for the conversion of certain personal property, consisting of household goods. The complaint, with certain immaterial exceptions, was in the usual form. The answer was a general denial and a plea, by way of further and separate answer, of the statute of limitations. On the trial, at the conclusion of the testimony of the appellant the respondent moved for judgment against the appellant, which motion the court sustained on the ground that the action had not been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allend v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Morgan v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Velsian v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Harpending v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Dodge v. BarnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gritman v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Gay v. HavermaleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Seaboard Securities Co., Inc. v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API