Catterlin v. Mitchell

Catterlin sued Mitchell in replevin. The complaint avers that the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to the possession of one four year old dun mare, of the value of one hundred and twenty-five dollars, which the defendant, on, &c., at the county of Clinton, wrongfully seized and took possession of, and still wrongfully and without right holds possession of, to the damage of the *299plaintiff one dollar; that the property has not been so taken for a tax, assessment or fine, pursuant to a statute, nor seized under an attachment or execution, but the same has been seized and taken by defendant…