Legal Opinion
Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of Maine
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 25, 1995No. Civ. 94-0212-BPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the Penobscot Indian Nation (“PIN”), filed a ten count complaint against nine Defendants, for claims arising out of a failed business venture. 1 PIN seeks declaratory judgement under 25 U.S.C. § 81, damages under state tort and contract theories, and civil RICO claims. Defendants Key Bank, CWC, Burlington, John Schiavi, John Palmer, Palmer Management, and Palmer Development move for Summary Judgement. Defendant SCH filed a Motion to Dismiss which, under the Court’s Order of June 7, 1995, will be treated as a Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Palmer Development Corp. v. GordonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Palmer Development Corp. v. GordonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of Maine, John Palmer, Palmer Management Corporation, and Palmer Development Corporation, Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of Maine, Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of Maine, John Schiavi, Penobscot Indian Nation v. Key Bank of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Penobscot Indian v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997