Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided June 23, 2008No. Nos. 20897-05, 1031-07UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE M. SANFORD, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Sanford v. Comm'r

Nos. 20897-05, 1031-07

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2008-158; 2008 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 159;

June 23, 2008, Filed

Michael T. Wells, for petitioner.

Valerie Makarewicz, for respondent.

Kroupa, Diane L.

DIANE L. KROUPA

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

KROUPA, Judge: Respondent determined a $ 15,505 deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax and a $ 3,101 accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for 2003. 1 Respondent determined a $ 41,012 deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax and an $…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  2. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Commissioner v. SchleierSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yates v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  2. Blackwood v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  3. Gorokhovsky v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  4. Jacques L. French & Sherry L. French v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
  5. Vladimir Gorokhovsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API