Legal Opinion

Gorokhovsky v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided February 28, 2013No. Docket No. 24015-10Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

VLADIMIR GOROKHOVSKY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Gorokhovsky v. Comm'r

Docket No. 24015-10

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2013-65; 2013 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 79; 105 T.C.M. (CCH) 1419;

February 28, 2013, Filed

Gorokhovsky v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2012-206, 2012 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 208 (T.C., 2012)

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Vladimir Gorokhovsky, Pro se.

Frederic J. Fernandez and Mark J. Miller, for respondent.

GOEKE, Judge.

GOEKE

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

GOEKE, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies and accuracy-related penalties under section…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  5. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API