Legal Opinion

Curry v. Corn

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul J. Widlitz, J.

Motion by the defendant, Lester E. Corn, M. D., to dismiss the complaint as insufficient pursuant to CPLE 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) is granted.

The complaint contains two causes of action. On this motion we are only concerned with the ‘1 First ’ ’. In that action, it is pleaded that the plaintiff was injured in mind and body after her physician, the movant, revealed to her husband information obtained by the movant in the course of treating the plaintiff. It is further pleaded: That to reveal this information to her husband violated ‘ ‘ the doctor-patient privilege as set forth in C.P.L.R. Sec.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of N.Y. City Council v. GoldwaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Berry v. MoenchUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Smith v. DriscollWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Simonsen v. SwensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Clark v. GeraciNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. ClingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Humphers v. First Interstate BankOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Doe v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mikel v. AbramsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API