Legal Opinion
Mann v. Rugel
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 31, 1950No. 14173PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOND, Chief Justice.
This is an.appeal from a judgment having its inception by way of an'alleged fraudulent transaction in connection with the sale of store fixtures or equipment, with a lease covering the premises where the fixtures were located. The case was tried to a jury, with facts submitted on special issues which were answered favorably to the plaintiff Paul Rugel (appellee herein) ; accordingly he was awarded damages against the defendant Roy Mann (appellant herein) and his alleged agent J. A. (Lon) Smith, jointly and severally, in the sum of $1,980. Roy Mann alone appealed and will…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hawkins v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Kaypar Corp. v. Fosterport Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1947
- Petros v. Superintendent of BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Newman v. LymanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Guitar Trust Estate v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arroyo Shrimp Farm, Inc. v. Hung Shrimp Farm, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Dial Temp Air Conditioning Company v. FaulhaberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Bartlett v. Schmidt, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- McCollum v. P/S INVESTMENTS, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- American Marine Upholstery Co. v. MinskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.