Legal Opinion
Consejo De Desarrollo Economico De Mexicali, AC v. United States
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 3, 2006No. 2:05-CV-0870-PMP (LRL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PRO, Chief Judge.
A long history precedes this action commenced July 19, 2005, by Plaintiffs’ Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief challenging the final authorization of the All-American Canal Lining Project (AACLP).
The Mexicali Aquifer underlies both the Imperial Valley in California and the Mexicali Valley in Mexico. Prior to 1901, waters from the Colorado and Alamo rivers recharged the Mexicali aquifer. In 1901, the Alamo Canal was constructed through the channelization of the Alamo River and because it was unlined, the river continued to recharge the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maria Felipe Suchite, an individual on behalf of herself and others v. ABM Aviation, Inc., a Georgia corporation, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Orndoff v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Stop B2H Coalition v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- United States v. 400 Acres of Land, more or less, situate in Lincoln County, State of NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019