Lieberman v. Weil
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment o-f tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: J. C. Ludwig, Circuit Judge. This action arose out of tbe following contract, in which-tbe plaintiff is tbe party of tbe second part and tbe defendants, are parties of tbe first part: “This agreement, made and entered into this seventeenth day of August, A. D. 1905, by and between Abraham Weil and Hairy Pflaum, copartners, doing business under the firm name of Weil, Pflaum & Company, parties of tbe first…
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment o-f tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: J. C. Ludwig, Circuit Judge. This action arose out of tbe following contract, in which-tbe plaintiff is tbe party of tbe second part and tbe defendants, are parties of tbe first part: “This agreement, made and entered into this seventeenth day of August, A. D. 1905, by and between Abraham Weil and Hairy Pflaum, copartners, doing business under the firm name of Weil, Pflaum & Company, parties of tbe first part, and Albert B. Liebermcun, party of the second part, witness-•eth: “(1) The parties of the first part hereby agree to…
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 11, 1910:
BabNes, J.
The defendants contend that the provisions of the first paragraph of the contract are controlling as to the compensation which plaintiff should receive. If this view of the contract is correct, plaintiff failed to show that he was entitled to recover any damages whatever. Defendants fur*638ther contend that they bad the right under the contract -to discharge the plaintiff at any time his services were not performed to their satisfaction; that they had reason tO' be and were dissatisfied with the services rendered, and had the unequivocal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manning v. School District No. 6Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Parr v. Northern Electrical Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richmond Dry Goods Co. v. WilsfnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
- Kolb v. BergelinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Town of Mineral Point v. City of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Silent Automatic Burner Co. v. Silent Automatic Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Simon v. Neptune Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941