Legal Opinion

Farquar v. City of Roseburg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, from the circuit court for Douglas county.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This was an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff on account of an excavation, which the defendant suffered to remain open without proper protection, etc., and of which it had timely notice, etc. The answer denied all the allegations of the complaint and alleged separately: ‘ ‘ That whatever injuries plaintiff sustained at said time, if any, were caused by the negligence and carelessness and fault of the plaintiff himself, in carelessly and negligently driving down the bank of the South Umpqua river, situate in Douglas county, Ore gon.” The reply put in issue this,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Goshen v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Paine v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carson v. City of GeneseeIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Batdorff v. Oregon CityOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Blue v. City of UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wade v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API