Legal Opinion

State v. Lucas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 11, 1966No. 667PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon a charge of assault with intent to commit rape of a female person above the age of twelve years, the State is required to show that the defendant actually committed an assault with intent to force the female to have sexual relations with him, notwithstanding any resistance she might make; however, since a child under the age of twelve years cannot give her consent, the requirement of force is not necessary to constitute the offense. The vast majority of the states subscribe to the doctrine that an assault upon a female under the age of consent with intent to have intercourse, constitutes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. State v. . DancySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. HartsellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. PennCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API