Legal Opinion

Platte & Denver Ditch Co. v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Denver. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This was. a suit by the appellee, Anderson, against the company and its lessees for damages to his pi’emises caused by the maintenance and operation of the ditch, and to have the said ditch abated as a public nuisance. There was a jury verdict of $500 damages for appellee, upon which judgment was rendered accordingly, and as our decision rests partly upon the failure of the evidence to, make out a case under the averments of the complaint, a statement of the substance of the complaint and evidence is permitted to a clear understanding of the case.

Appellee, as plaintiff below, averred:

1st.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Denver v. BayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. City of Denver v. MullenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  3. McDonald v. EnglishIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Smiths' v. McConathySupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  5. City of Morrison v. HinksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hiss v. HissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Platte & Denver C. & M. Co. v. DowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. North Sterling Irrigation District v. DickmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Greeley Irrigating Co. v. HouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Jackson v. AckroydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API