Legal Opinion

Consolidated Farmers Mutual Insurance v. Anchor Savings Ass'n

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 7, 1979No. 78-4094PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROGERS, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This is an antitrust action brought pursuant to Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and under unspecified sections of the Kansas antitrust laws contained in K.S.A. 50-101 et seq.

Plaintiffs Consolidated Farmers Mutual Insurance Company and Kansas Mutual Insurance Company are two Kansas insurance companies which as part of their businesses sell real property hazard insurance.

Defendant Anchor Savings Association is a Kansas savings and loan association. Defendant Fidelity Investment Company is a Kansas mortgage banker.…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  4. Levitch v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  5. Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API