Legal Opinion
Friedlander v. Troutman
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 9, 1986No. 85-8399PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
In this case we must determine the most appropriate state statute of limitations to apply to a claim for a violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.-10b-5.
I
Friedlander alleges that Troutman, Sanders participated in a scheme to defraud him and other members of the class he represents in connection with the forced sale of stock owned by members of the class. The principal transaction involved in the alleged fraud took place in November 1980. Fried-lander brought the instant suit in the federal District Court…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Friedlander v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Nichols v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
- Vargas v. Salvation ArmyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986