Siebe v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Prohibition from the Supreme Court to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco-William T. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The petitioner herein was elected to the office of assessor for the city and county of San Francisco at the general election in 1894, and qualified for said office in the succeeding January, and has since acted as such assessor. Prior to the first day of July, 1895, as such assessor, he assessed the property of the Market Street Railway Company, a corporation organized under the laws of this state, and having property in said city and county, for the fiscal year ending July 1, 1895, at the sum of three million eight hundred and eighty-three thousand eight hundred and sixty-*552six…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clunie v. SiebeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gilde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Ferguson v. Superior Court of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Dorris v. McKamyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Edson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.