Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Catoire and Higgins

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 13, 2020No. 120249Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 120,249 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of the Marriage of MICHELE CATOIRE, Appellant, and JAMES MICHAEL HIGGINS, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Johnson District Court; ERICA K. SCHOENIG, judge. Opinion filed March 13, 2020. Affirmed. Michele Catoire, appellant pro se. No appearance by appellee. Before GARDNER, P.J., BUSER, J., and BURGESS, S.J. PER CURIAM: Michele Catoire (Mother) and James Michael Higgins (Father) were involved in a very contentious divorce. In an agreed parenting plan, Father was granted primary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Kansas State Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Biglow v. EidenbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. K.A. v. T.R.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  4. Foster v. Stonebridge Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API