Legal Opinion

People v. Hamelin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 15, 1979No. 78-1028PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi

Defendant Arthur Hamelin, age 24, was charged with indecent liberties with a child, contributing to the sexual delinquency of a child, and deviate sexual assault. A jury found him guilty of the indecent-liberties and sexual-delinquency charges, but not guilty of the deviate-sexual-assault charge. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, pars. 11—4, 11—5, 11—3.) Judgment was entered on the indecent-liberties verdict and he was sentenced to a term of 4-6 years. The judge did not enter judgment on the sexual-delinquency verdict because the crime merged into the greater crime of indecent liberties.

Defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. The People v. HenryIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. KeeganIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. The PEOPLE v. MallettIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. KellasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. LynomAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. People v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. People v. EcholsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. CruzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API