Legal Opinion

Williams v. Sage

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 2, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Submission of a • controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, J.:

The plaintiff transferred stock to two persons in trust for the purposes determined by a writing executed in July, 1906. The plaintiff would revoke the trust and has the consent of his wife, Anna C. Williams, and of his and her three children, all of whom are of full age. But one of the children, Mrs. Malone, has a child of the age of three years. The question is whether the trust can be revoked without the consent of such grandchild. That depends upon the answer to the question, whether such grandchild is “ beneficially interested ” in the trust, for if she be so her consent is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. LittelNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Kent v. . Church of St. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Hennessy v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Campbell v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Townshend v. . FrommerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gage v. Irving Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Hammond v. Chemung Canal Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. County Trust Co. v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Schoellkopf v. Marine Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Armstrong v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API