Legal Opinion

Norment v. Wofford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1980No. 36168PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Chief Justice.

Under Code Ann. § 55-103, the superior court in “[e]quity will not enjoin the proceedings and processes of a court of law, unless there shall be some intervening equity or other proper defense of which the party, without fault on his part, cannot avail himself at law.” Appellant Norment sought an injunction under this section because she could not raise her tort counterclaim because of lack of jurisdiction1 in the state court to entertain it. The trial court refused the injunction. We reverse.

Under the allegations of both of the complaints,2 it appears that both…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Acree v. KaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Bragg v. GavinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Otis v. Graham Paper Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Carswell v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Tronitec, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Troop Construction Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Morris v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Morris v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API