Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1987No. 14866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

By motion filed under Rule 27.26 appellant sought to receive an order of the trial court granting him credit for time served in the State of Colorado while under a Missouri detainer. The trial court sustained respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissed appellant’s motion without an evi-dentiary hearing.

Apparently a question of credit for time served may be raised in a Rule 27.26 procedure. See Hart v. State, 588 S.W.2d 226, 227 (Mo.App.1979). However, as this was at least appellant’s second motion under Rule 27.26, he was required to allege a reason or reasons which,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hart v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Newman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Miller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seevers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API