Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Buckman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1988No. C5-87-3Published

1Opinion of the Court

433 N.W.2d 98 (1988)

Mark A. SCHNEIDER, Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

Harold BUCKMAN, individually and d/b/a Buckman-Schierts Ambulance Service, Respondent,

Pam Buckman, Respondent.

No. C5-87-3.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 23, 1988.

Kenneth R. Moen, Rochester, for appellant.

Robert C. Bell, St. Paul, for Harold Buckman.

Frederic N. Brown and Thomas P. Kelly, Brown & Bins, Rochester, for Pam Buckman.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

WAHL, Justice.

Mark Schneider brought a negligence action against Harold Buckman, owner and operator of Buckman-Schierts Ambulance Service, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Lunderberg v. BiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Payne v. Bilco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Hosley v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Schneider v. BuckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API