Legal Opinion

Monahan Corp. N v. v. Whitty

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 1, 2004No. CIV.A. 00-11424-LPCPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND SANCTIONS. LAWRENCE P. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to Rules 7.1(d) and (e) of the Local Rules of this Court [effective September 1, 1990], and upon review of the relevant pleadings, Defendants 'Blake J. Godbout and DiMaria & Godbout, P.A.’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and M.G.L. 231, § 6F (# 157) is denied to the extent that it relates to attorneys’ fees, and is allowed insofar as it relates to costs under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

1. G.L. c. 281. § 6F: To the extent that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brandon Associates, LLC v. FailSafe Air Safety Systems Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  2. Telman v. BrinkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  3. Beacon Towers Condominium Trust v. AlexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Endobotics LLC v. Designs Standards Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
  5. Government Employees Insurance Company v. Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API