Paciona v. Marshall
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division dismissing the petition should be affirmed solely on the ground that an article 78 proceeding, in the nature of prohibition, is not the proper vehicle for reviewing an alleged defect in the Grand Jury selection process.
A determination in a criminal case is not reviewable in an article 78 proceeding, in the nature of prohibition, unless the court in making the determination exceeded its jurisdictional powers. (See CPLR 7801, subd. 2; e.g., Matter of Lee v. County Ct. of Erie County, 27 N Y 2d 432; Matter of Proskin v. County Ct. of Albany County, 30 N Y…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
3Cited by10 opinions
- James Barber v. James PonteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- People v. KampshoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Allen v. StroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. GrohAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Rossettie ex rel. Young v. FinnertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.