Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Mountain Brook

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 1992No. 1901412, 1901450PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves an appeal by the plaintiffs, Walter F. Scott, Jr., and Andrew C. Scott, of the dismissal of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and a cross-appeal by the defendants, the City of Mountain Brook and others (“Mountain Brook”). Mountain Brook’s cross-appeal was from a judgment granting equitable relief in the same case, which judgment may have led to § 1983 liability on the part of Mountain Brook if the Scotts were sucessful on appeal. Therefore, Mountain Brook’s cross-appeal was a defensive response to the Scotts’ appeal.

This case is before us on petitions of both the Scotts and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. StedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Scott v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brooks v. HobbieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Scott v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API