Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Mountain Brook

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 26, 1991No. 2900366, 2900366-XPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

At the outset we note that this case was originally filed in the Supreme Court of Alabama. However,' the supreme court transferred it to this court. Although there are multiple aspects of this appeal, it began as an appeal from the denial of a rezoning request to circuit court and a claim for damages in the amount of five million dollars. The City of Mountain Brook, a legislative body, voted to deny Walter F. Scott and Andrew C. Scott’s request to rezone certain property. The Scotts then appealed the zoning issue to the trial court. After an ore tenus proceeding,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Owens v. BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. City of Mountain BrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API