Legal Opinion
State v. Hernandez
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 7, 1997No. Nos. 19077-0-II; 19624-7-II; 19607-7-II; 19185-7-IIPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
In these consolidated appeals, Juan Davila, Leobardo Gill, and Arturo Hernandez challenge their convictions for the delivery of controlled substances. Ruben Soto appeals his conviction for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. The appellants all contend that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the object delivered was a controlled substance. In addition, Davila challenges a jury instruction. We find that the evidence was sufficient and that the jury instruction was neither a comment on the evidence nor a misstatement of the law. Thus, we affirm.
DISCUSSION
In each of these…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- United States v. Donald SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- State v. ChapinWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Charles E. Toliver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. DeVriesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Lodis v. Corbis Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Faust v. AlbertsonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.