Legal Opinion

Great Western Mfg. Co. v. Davidson Mill & Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1910No. 612PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from.\ District Court, Muslcogee County; Malcolm, E. Rosser, Judge. Action between the Great Western Manufacturing Company and the Davidson Mill & Elevator Company. From the judgment, the Great Western Manufacturing Company brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The first 21 assignments of error relate to the admission or exclusion of evidence. Rule 25 of the rules of this ■court, as .revised on March 12, 1908, and December 7, 1909 (20 Oída, xii, 95 Pac. viii), provides:

“Where a party complains on account of the admission or rejection of testimony, he shall set out in his brief the full substance ■of the testimony, to the admission or rejection of which he objects, stating specifically his objection thereto.”

The plaintiff in error has failed to set ont in his brief the full substance of the evidence to the admission or rejection of which he objects,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Terrapin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Lynn v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Model LaundrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Ward v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Hilsmeyer v. BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API