People v. Sacks
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Crane, Ch. J.
The defendants have been convicted of the crime of violating section 340 of the Banking Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 2), and the judgment has been affirmed by the Appellate Division on the ground that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conspiracy count in the information, thereby indicating that as to the other count the evidence was insufficient in the opinion of that court. The information is in two counts: The first charges the crime of violating section 340 of the Banking Law, in that the defendants did unlawfully engage in the business of making loans “ of money, credit,…
2Cited by14 opinions
- People v. RalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Mesaba Loan Co. v. SherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1958
- People v. Matthews, New York County Courts1956
- People v. Tanner, New York County Courts1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.