Legal Opinion
State v. Lenihan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 13, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
GUADAGNO, P.J.F.P.
(temporarily assigned).
In this ease we are asked to determine whether a violation of N.J.S.A. 39:3-76.2f, the “seat belt law,” can serve as a predicate offense to support a conviction under N.J.S.A. 2C:40-18(b), which proscribes knowingly violating a law or failing to perform a duty imposed by law intended to protect the public health and safety and recklessly causing serious bodily injury. Defendant appeals her plea-bargained conviction under N.J.S.A. 2C:40-18(b), arguing the law is unconstitutionally vague and the seat belt law is…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Heyert v. TaddeseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- State v. Kirby Lenihan (071497)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- State v. BernardiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARK BROWNE (13-08-1529, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. RICHARD W. BERNARDI, SR. (16-02-0014, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018