Legal Opinion

Vatterott v. Kay

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1984No. 47441PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

In an unlawful detainer action, sellers received a judgment against buyers for $16,500.00 in damages as double the fair rental value of the property. See § 534.-030, RSMo 1978. The parties waived a jury and tried the action to the court. Our review is therefore circumscribed by Rule 73.01(c) as interpreted by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976): whether substantial evidence supports the judgment and whether the trial court erroneously declared or applied the law. We reverse with instructions to enter judgment in favor of buyers.

This is a companion case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Dunning v. Alfred H. Mayer CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Kay v. VatterottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Heller v. JentzschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  5. Young v. IngleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Bach v. McGrathMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Henze v. Shell Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Phelps v. PhelpsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Jaycox v. E.M. Harris Building Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API