Legal Opinion

Unger v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Allegan. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

The main features of this case may very briefly be stated. In December, 1875, plaintiff and defendant made an exchange of certain real estate, and in the deed from Smith to Unger a clause was inserted that “this conveyance subject.to a mortgage executed by Joseph Smith and wife to Henry W. Bly for the amount of four hundred dollars and inferest, dated sometime in the month oí September, October or November, 1875, due two years from date, which said mortgage the party of the second part hereby agrees to pay.” The party of the second part, Mrs. Unger, did pay this mortgage, and the present…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Miller v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kollen v. SooyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Burbank v. RootsColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Desmond v. McNamaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. South Carolina Insurance Co. v. KohnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Wolff v. Alpena National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API