Legal Opinion

Ritchie v. Burke

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided May 29, 1901No. 6,117PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. On demurrers to hill.

1Opinion of the Court

WING, District Judge.

A hill has been filed by the complainants, Samuel J. Ritchie and Sophronia J. Ritchie, against Stevenson Burke and others, to set aside a decree entered on the records of this court in a cause wherein James B. McMullen and George W. McMullen were complainants, and all the parties defendant in this cause, natural and artificial, excepting William McParlin, John B. Wright, and Charles Baird, were defendants,‘and also the complainants herein, Samuel J. Ritchie and Sophronia J. Ritchie. One Thomas W. Cornell was also a defendant in that cause, but, be being now deceased, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Dunn v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  3. Hardenbergh v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Tug River Coal & Salt Co. v. BrigelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. Waterbury Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Hook v. CraryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. McSherry Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  4. Schram v. TobiasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1941
  5. Ball v. Bank of Bay BiscayneDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API