Legal Opinion

Skipitarey v. Fitts

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1932No. Docket No. 7222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[1] The respondents have made a motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that appellants' opening brief violates that portion of Rule VIII of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal requiring each point to be presented separately "under an appropriate heading, showing the nature of the question to be presented or the point to be made". There are but two headings or titles in the brief, the one "Statement of the Case" and the other "Argument". It is manifest that respondents' motion is well founded. (See Barnes v. Cocke, 99 Cal.App. 700 [279 P. 190], Hawkins v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Barnes v. CockeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. People v. YaroslawskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Withers v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cunnyngham v. Mason-Mcduffie Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Herlihy v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Currier v. Oakland AssociationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API