Legal Opinion

Withers v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1929No. Docket No. 6243PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of nonsuit rendered against them in the court below. Their opening brief is all contained under one heading, to wit: “Statement.” Some of the pleadings are set forth and then appellants tell us in the most general way about some testimony which was excluded, whether erroneously we cannot judge because sufficient to enable us to say is not printed either in the brief or an appendix thereto. Neither the questions nor objections are set forth. Whether they were sufficient in form or substance cannot be determined from any printed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keele v. ClouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Filmer v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Skipitarey v. FittsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Best v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Skipitarey v. FittsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API