Legal Opinion
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United States
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 21, 2007No. 05-23045-CIV-MOOREPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
K. MICHAEL MOORE, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Federal Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt # 131) and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt # 134). The Parties’ cross motions for summary judgment stem from the Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (dkt # 76). Counts I, II, and IV, of the Second Amended Complaint (dkt #76) are the only remaining claims.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motions, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010