Legal Opinion
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United States
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided March 19, 2010No. Case 05-23045-CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MICCO-SUKEE TRIBE OF FLORIDA’S MOTION TO ENFORCE THE MANDATE
K. MICHAEL MOORE, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Miccosukee Tribe of Florida’s Motion to Enforce the Mandate (dkt. # 205).
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the Responses, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Court enters the following Order.
I. BACKGROUND
The Cape Sable seaside sparrow (“sparrow”) represents one out of eight subspecies of North American seaside sparrow. 1 Biological Opinion 2006 at 21 (“BiOp…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Cupps v. Pioneer Canal-LakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019