Pitzer v. Demianew

This appeal arises from a garnishment proceeding.1 The garnishees contend that because the plaintiffs failed to comply with certain statutory requirements for a garnishment, the court lacked jurisdiction to consider plaintiffs’ claim.2

Plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against defendants. A garnishment writ was served on Gen-Russ, Inc., which is not a party to this proceeding. It responded that no monies were due. Later writs were also served on that corporation, which did not afford relief. Then plaintiffs served the garnishees Demianew with an execution and a "Notice of Levy on…