Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Aumsville Mercantile Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Marion: Percy R. Kelly, Judge. This is a garnishment proceeding by M. A. McLaughlin and Roy H. Wassam, partners as the Salem Lumber Company, against the Aumsville Mercantile Company, defendant, and the E. M. Condit & Company, garnishee. From a judgment for plaintiffs against the garnishee, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey

On July 7, 1913, the plaintiffs obtained a judgment in the Circuit Court of Marion County against the defendant, the Aumsville Mercantile Company, a corporation, for $168.30. On July 14, 1913, the plaintiffs caused a writ of execution to issue out of said court to enforce said judgment, and placed it in the *82hands of the sheriff of said county for service. On July 15, 1913, garnishment process was duly served on E. M. Condit & Co., for the purpose of levying upon, in the possession of said company, certain personal property, alleged to belong to the defendant, the Aumsville Mercantile Company.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Case v. NoyesOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Smith v. ConradOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Altona v. DabneyOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Case v. NoyesOregon Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oregon Growers' Co-operative Ass'n v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. First Nat. Bank v. ManassaOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Overturff v. CarrollOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Murphy v. BjelikOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Pitzer v. DemianewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API