Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCohalan, J.
The main issue raised by this proceeding is whether the petitioner, a private employer, is obligated to provide the same benefits for pregnancy-related disabilities as are granted for other temporary disabilities, despite the exclusion of pregnancy-related disabilities in the Disability Benefits *382Law (Workmen’s Compensation Law, art 9) and in the Employee Benefit Plan of the petitioner. As interpreted in cases involving schools and school teachers, the overwhelming weight of authority mandates that the benefits be provided. We think the reasons stated in those cases have no instant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Union Free School District No. 6 v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Board of Education v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2 v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Division of Human Rights v. Jamestown Telephone Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976