Legal Opinion
Schwab v. Getty
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 1927No. 20534. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Appellant sued upon an instrument reading:
“Yakima, Washington, 3-2 1923 Yakima Ave. Near Third St.
“Mr. Anton Schwab,
Roslyn, Wash.
Dear Friend Schwab:
Referring to our talk at the depot yesterday, regarding the one thousand dollars worth of stock, Mr. Summers and I both agree to take back same Jan. 1st, 1924, after that time you do not wish to keep it, providing you give us fifteen days notice.
“Yours very truly,
“Yakima Shoe Co.
“Geo. A. Getty, Pres.
“P. S. Summers, Sec.”
The evidence introduced on behalf of appellant shows that, on and prior to February 28, 1923, respondent Getty and the decedent…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- People's Bank v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Austin, Nichols Co., Inc. v. GrossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Way v. Lyric Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- New Georgia National Bank of Albany, Georgia v. J. & G. LippmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Diversified Realty, Inc. v. McElroyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Diversified Realty, Inc. v. McElroyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.