Legal Opinion
Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 7, 2004No. 01-CV-4340 (WJM)PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTINI, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants Samsung Electronics Co., et al.’s (“Samsung’s”) appeal of Magistrate Judge Hedges’ July 7, 2004 and September 1, 2004 Orders. Samsung appealed four different sanctions. Previously, this Court affirmed two of the four sanctions: proof of infringement as to representative parts determines infringement for all parts, and Samsung is precluded from challenging MOSAID Technologies Ine.’s (“MOSAID’s”) expert evidence as to the operation of the representative parts to the extent those challenges rely on any assumptions made…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Kenneth Gumbs and Yvonne Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Kounelis v. SherrerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Micron Technology, Inc. v. Rambus Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Wachtel v. Health Net, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.